Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151909›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2025

Flowering Plant Microbiomes and Network Interactions Across an Urban Gradient.

Katherine D Chau, Makaylee K Crone, Phuong N Nguyen, Sandra M Rehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine D ChauDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8355-3051
Makaylee K CroneDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9103-7738
Phuong N NguyenDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7220-0402
Sandra M RehanDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6441-5155

Funding

Mitacs Elevate FellowshipNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NFRFT-2020-00073Ontario Graduate ScholarshipWeston Family Foundation Microbiome Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used flowers to explore how ephemeral anthosphere microbiomes differ among flowering plant species and along an urban gradient. Here, we sequenced 16S rRNA for bacteria, ITS1 for fungi and rbcL for plant DNA from 10 different plant species sampled to characterise anthosphere microbiomes along an urban gradient and identify important network interactions. Bacterial and fungal flower microbiomes significantly differed in diversity across plant species, especially among Asteraceae and Fabaceae. Across all analyses, four taxa, the bacteria Pantoea and Rosenbergiella and the fungi Alternaria and Cladosporium were highly prevalent and contributed to the majority of microbiome composition differences observed between plant species. These four taxa harbour strains or species that may be either pathogenic or beneficial to plants. Across a land use gradient, the plant community bacterial and fungal microbiome was stable and consistent. Flower-plant networks confirmed all focal flower families in abundance on each sampled flower, with the addition of Paulowniaceae, suggesting that pollinators visiting the focal flowers also visit this plant family. Our findings reveal that anthosphere microbiomes are diverse at the plant community level and encouragingly remain robust against urbanisation.

Indexed as

BacteriaFlowersFungiMagnoliopsidaMicrobiotaBiodiversityCitiesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santhosphere microbiomebipartiteco‐occurrence networksfloral healthpollinatorurban land use

Identifiers

PMID40151909
PMCPMC11950910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.