ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2025
Tracking Different States of Spiked Environmental DNA Using Multiplex Digital PCR Assays.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Gene Copies to Cell Numbers: Advancing Quantitative Approaches in Protistan Ecology Using Digital PCR.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- State-Specific Extraction of Environmental DNA: Spike-and-Recovery Controls to Validate and Optimise Extraction Protocols.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of microbial communities based on the total environmental DNA (eDNA) is influenced by the presence of different eDNA states, i.e., intracellular (iDNA) and extracellular DNA (exDNA), and the choice of the DNA extraction method. Although the use of spike-and-recovery controls facilitates the diagnosis of such issues, appropriate experimental setups simultaneously accounting for the different eDNA states and their bacterial origins are missing. Here, we used two single-gene deletion mutants of both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis to trace exDNA and iDNA spike-ins of each selected model organism within environmental samples. Unique primer/probe sets were developed for each strain, allowing their absolute quantification using multiplex digital PCR assays. The proposed spike-and-recovery controls were successfully applied to various environments including soil, sediment, sludge and compost. While the percent recovery of spiked iDNA differed significantly between E. coli and B. subtilis, results were similar for both model organisms in the case of spiked exDNA, emphasising that the fate of DNA molecules in the environment is similar irrespective of their bacterial origin. Hence, future studies may benefit from the proposed approach to better understand methodological ambiguities related to the eDNA extraction in general as well as the separation of the different eDNA states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.