Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151832›Full record

ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2025

Efficacy of different interventions on the morbidity of the palatal donor area after free gingival graft and connective tissue graft: A systematic review.

Gabriel Guimarães Leite, Karolina Skarlet Silva Viana, Luís Otávio Miranda Cota, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Rafael Paschoal Esteves Lima, Fernando Oliveira Costa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07458685 (Efficacy of Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid in Improving Healing After Free Gingival Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07458685 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid in Improving Healing After Free Gingival Graft: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MilanRan2022 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsPalatal Donor Site Wound Healing, Palatal WoundArmsTest - xHyA, Negative control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriel Guimarães LeiteDepartment of Dental Clinics, Oral Pathology and Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Antônio Carlos Avenue, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Karolina Skarlet Silva VianaDepartment of Dental Clinics, Oral Pathology and Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Antônio Carlos Avenue, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Luís Otávio Miranda CotaDepartment of Dental Clinics, Oral Pathology and Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Antônio Carlos Avenue, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lucas Guimarães AbreuDepartment of Child and Adolescent Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Antônio Carlos Avenue, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rafael Paschoal Esteves LimaDepartment of Dental Clinics, Oral Pathology and Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Antônio Carlos Avenue, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fernando Oliveira CostaDepartment of Dental Clinics, Oral Pathology and Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Antônio Carlos Avenue, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different interventions used on the palatal donor area in the treatment of postoperative pain after free gingival graft and connective tissue graft techniques, and their impact in the oral-health related quality of life (OHRQOL). This study was conducted according to PRISMA. A search was conducted in four electronic databases and the grey literature. The interventions found were grouped according to biological plausibility and mechanisms of action: Mechanical Barriers; Topical Drugs; Hemostatic Agents; Other Therapies (photobiomodulation, ozonotherapy and others). Fifty-four studies were included and 43 different interventions were reported. The most commonly reported intervention was collagen hemostatic sponge, either alone or combined with other interventions, followed by platelet-rich fibrin and photobiomodulation. Postoperative pain evaluation using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) generally indicated that interventions improved pain over time. However, comparing the superiority of interventions is challenging, as studies often combine different interventions with different mechanisms of action. OHRQOL also showed improvement over time, but the comparison between interventions is limited, since few studies used a validated tool. The methodological diversity among studies is considerable, requiring a cautious interpretation of individual studies.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsHard palateOrofacial painSoft tissue grafting

Identifiers

PMID40151832
PMCPMC11946501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.