ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A semantic segmentation-based automatic pterygium assessment and grading system.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic Guidance in Ocular Surface Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Quality assessment of dry eye educational videos on Xiaohongshu and differences by uploader type.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in refractive surgery: progress, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pterygium, a prevalent ocular disorder, requires accurate severity assessment to optimize treatment and alleviate patient suffering. The growing patient population and limited ophthalmologist resources necessitate efficient AI-based diagnostic solutions. This study aims to develop an automated grading system combining deep learning and image processing techniques for precise pterygium evaluation. Methods: The proposed system integrates two modules: 1) A semantic segmentation module utilizing an improved TransUnet architecture for pixel-level pterygium localization, trained on annotated slit-lamp microscope images from clinical datasets. 2) A severity assessment module employing enhanced curve fitting algorithms to quantify pterygium invasion depth in critical ocular regions. The framework merges deep learning with traditional computational methods for comprehensive analysis. Results: The semantic segmentation model achieved an average Dice coefficient of 0.9489 (0.9041 specifically for pterygium class) on test datasets. In clinical validation, the system attained 0.9360 grading accuracy and 0.9363 weighted F1 score. Notably, it demonstrated strong agreement with expert evaluations (Kappa coefficient: 0.8908), confirming its diagnostic reliability. Discussion: The AI-based diagnostic method proposed in this study achieves automatic grading of pterygium by integrating semantic segmentation and curve fitting technology, which is highly consistent with the clinical evaluation of doctors. The quantitative evaluation framework established in this study is expected to meet multiple clinical needs beyond basic diagnosis. The construction of the data set should continue to be optimized in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.