Transformer-based ensemble model for dialectal Arabic sentiment classification.

Social media platforms such as X, Facebook, and Instagram have become essential avenues for individuals to articulate their opinions, especially during global emergencies. These platforms offer valuable insights that necessitate analysis for informed decision-making and a deeper understanding of societal trends. Sentiment analysis is crucial for assessing public sentiment toward specific issues; however, applying it to dialectal Arabic presents considerable challenges in natural language processing. The complexity arises from the language's intricate semantic and morphological structures, along with the existence of multiple dialects. This form of analysis, also referred to as sentiment classification, opinion mining, emotion mining, and review mining, is the focus of this study, which analyzes tweets from three benchmark datasets: the Arabic Sentiment Tweets Dataset (ASTD), the A Twitter-based Benchmark Arabic Sentiment Analysis Dataset (ASAD), and the Tweets Emoji Arabic Dataset (TEAD). The research involves experimentation with a variety of comparative models, including machine learning, deep learning, transformer-based models, and a transformer-based ensemble model. Feature extraction for both machine learning and deep learning approaches is performed using techniques such as AraVec, FastText, AraBERT, and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF). The study compares machine learning models such as support vector machine (SVM), naïve Bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) with deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM) networks. Additionally, it explores transformer-based models such as CAMeLBERT, XLM-RoBERTa, and MARBERT, along with their ensemble configurations. The findings demonstrate that the proposed transformer-based ensemble model achieved superior performance, with average accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score of 90.4%, 88%, 87.3%, and 87.7%, respectively.