ArticleCureus2025
Anaphylaxis to Banana and Persistent Sensitization to Thaumatin-Like Protein: An Emergent Culprit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bananas contain different allergens, and reactions vary in severity. Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs) present high stability during digestion and heat treatment. Data regarding reaction severity and acquisition of tolerance are lacking. A two-year-old child presented with anaphylaxis after eating a banana. He was treated with corticosteroids and antihistamines on the way to the emergency department (ED) by his mother. Adrenaline was not administered as he had already improved upon arriving at the ED. The child had tolerated all fruits introduced into his diet, including bananas. He had never eaten kiwi. Skin prick tests (SPT) were positive for banana and kiwi and negative for aeroallergens, lipid transfer proteins, profilin, and latex. Skin prick-to-prick test (SPPT) with banana was positive. The specific IgE for bananas was 2.85 kUA/L. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) immunoblotting with banana extracts and the patient's serum showed an IgE-binding band compatible with Mus a 4 (banana TLP). Eviction of kiwis and bananas was recommended. At the age of six, the child presented with rhinoconjunctivitis during spring. SPT was positive for grass pollen and positive for banana and kiwi. The ImmunoCAP Immuno-Solid Phase Allergy Chip (ISAC®) test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) demonstrated positive IgE against nAct d 2 (kiwi TLP), rPhl p 1, rPhl p 5, and rPhl p 11. Banana and kiwi eviction was maintained. Oral provocation was not performed. At the age of nine, the child started immunotherapy for grass pollen. Banana and kiwi SPPT remained positive. This case illustrates the atopic march, with banana as the culprit food and TLP as the potential sensitizer. nAct d 2 is homologous to Mus a 4, which is not available in ISAC®. We highlight the severity of the reaction and the persistence of sensitization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.