Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151726›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Soft Tissue Management in Implant Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.

Sumeet Agarwal, Sanpreet S Sachdev, Laresh N Mistry, Sneh Agrawal, Shantanu Deshpande, Vivek Sharma, Rohit Thorat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sumeet AgarwalProsthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Sanpreet S SachdevOral Pathology and Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Laresh N MistryPediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Sneh AgrawalPeriodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Shantanu DeshpandePediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Vivek SharmaPeriodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Rohit ThoratProsthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of dental implant therapy relies on achieving optimal osseointegration while maintaining the esthetics and function of the surrounding soft tissues. Soft tissue management plays a crucial role in ensuring long-term implant stability, preventing complications, and enhancing esthetic outcomes. The peri-implant mucosa differs structurally and functionally from the gingiva surrounding natural teeth, necessitating specific augmentation strategies to compensate for tissue deficiencies. Factors such as biotype, mucogingival conditions, wound healing dynamics, ridge deficiencies, general patient health, genetics, and oral habits such as smoking influence treatment outcomes. Various soft tissue augmentation techniques, including pedicle grafts, free connective tissue grafts, pouch grafts, and onlay grafts, have been employed to enhance peri-implant soft tissue volume and contour. These procedures improve keratinized mucosa width, reduce mid-buccal recession, and contribute to superior pink esthetic scores. While immediate and delayed soft tissue augmentation protocols exist, the optimal timing remains debated. Clinical evidence suggests that augmenting soft tissue in conjunction with implant placement improves long-term esthetic outcomes and minimizes peri-implant bone loss. The present review highlights the significance of soft tissue augmentation in implant dentistry, emphasizing its role in improving peri-implant health, function, and patient satisfaction in esthetically demanding cases.

Indexed as

esthetic implant outcomesimplant dentistrykeratinized tissuemucogingival managementosseointegrationperi-implant mucosasoft tissue augmentation

Identifiers

PMID40151726
PMCPMC11946930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.