ReviewCureus2025
Post-vasectomy Pain Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and Updated Treatment Algorithm.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-vasectomy pain syndrome: prevention and management utilizing current evidence and clinical pearls.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-vasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) affects a small but significant percentage of men following vasectomy. PVPS is characterized by persistent scrotal pain that disrupts daily activities and requires medical intervention. With hundreds of thousands of vasectomies performed annually in the US, and PVPS being a real and often devastating potential consequence, understanding its etiology and treatment options is crucial. Managing PVPS can be challenging, yet with thorough evaluation, it can be effectively addressed. It is imperative to undergo a comprehensive diagnostic process, including physical examination, urine studies, and imaging studies, to distinguish PVPS from other potential causes of scrotal pain. Our objective was to review the literature on PVPS, highlight its etiology, and provide an updated evaluation and treatment algorithm. We conducted a comprehensive literature review using electronic databases via PubMed, which were searched from the start of publications until February 1, 2024. Studies including retrospective, prospective, observational, case-control, cohort, case series, and case reports were all eligible for review. Articles not published in English and conference abstracts were excluded from our review. In our review, options for non-invasive treatments for PVPS include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), and anticonvulsants. Spermatic cord blocks are effective in diagnosing and managing chronic orchialgia, particularly when conservative treatments fail. Surgical interventions, including microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC), epididymectomy, vasovasostomy, and orchiectomy, are considered after exhausting non-invasive options. Various studies demonstrate the effectiveness of these surgical methods, highlighting their potential as treatment options depending on the individual case. An algorithmic evaluation method followed by a patient-specific treatment approach is key to managing PVPS, given its varied etiology and the differential effectiveness of treatment options. Understanding and addressing this complex condition is crucial to improving the quality of life for affected individuals. In conclusion, an algorithmic evaluation method followed by a patient-specific treatment approach is key to managing PVPS, given its varied etiology and the differential effectiveness of treatment options. Understanding and addressing this complex condition is crucial to improving the quality of life for affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.