ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Surgical Safety: Evaluating Compliance With the WHO Checklist in a Peripheral Hospital in Sri Lanka.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compliance and completeness of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in a tertiary-level neurosurgical center in Nepal: a retrospective descriptive audit.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Transforming surgical care and safety: dissecting the impact of checklists in the global south.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is utilised globally to enhance communication and teamwork, ensuring patient safety in surgeries and reducing complications and mortality. Despite its efficacy, compliance with the checklist may be variable, particularly in resource-limited settings. This audit evaluated the adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in the surgical theatre of Base Hospital Thambuththegama, Sri Lanka, to identify the gaps and areas for improvement. Methods A prospective audit assessed 102 surgical cases over three weeks, including elective and non-elective procedures. Data collection involved real-time observation of checklist use and assessment of staff participation. Compliance was evaluated based on checklist attachment, completion, and timing, while staff participation rates were analysed across roles. Results In 87.25% of cases, the checklist was attached to the bed head ticket (BHT). Fully completed checklists were observed in only 34.31% of cases, with just 13.73% completed at the correct time. Staff participation was highest among anaesthetists (90.5%) and house officers (88.1%) but significantly lower among consultants (7.1%). Key barriers included incomplete sections, incorrect timing, and inconsistent participation from senior staff. Conclusions The audit highlights critical gaps in compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, emphasising the need for targeted interventions. These include staff training, real-time monitoring, and enhanced accountability. Addressing these gaps can significantly improve surgical safety and patient outcomes. A re-audit is planned to evaluate the impact of the proposed changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.