Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151656›Full record

ArticleAutism in adulthood2025

Development and Initial Validation of the Autism and Neurodiversity Attitudes Scale.

Rachel A VanDaalen, Frank R Dillon, Carlos E Santos, Cristalis Capielo Rosario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism in adulthood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel A VanDaalenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2097-3769
Frank R DillonDepartment of Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-8362
Carlos E SantosDepartment of Social Welfare, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-5471
Cristalis Capielo RosarioDepartment of Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5275-7094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drawn from aspects of the autistic self-advocacy movement, the neurodiversity movement is a conceptual framework and sociopolitical movement that views neurological differences and disabilities (e.g., autism) as natural human variations that can form a central component of one's identity. This study presents the development and validation of a scale to assess endorsement of neurodiversity beliefs with respect to autism among both autistic and nonautistic adults. Methods: Diverse samples of adults were utilized to conduct exploratory ( Results: The three factors consisted of Conclusion: The validity results are congruent with the historical roots of the neurodiversity movement and the attitudes endorsed by many autistic adults. Given the factor structure and reliability results, researchers can use this scale to assess neurodiversity-affirming attitudes as a unitary construct or can use the anti-stigma subscale to assess stigma-related attitudes toward autism. This scale has utility for researchers that seek to understand and promote well-being in autistic adults, as well as research related to potential support systems in the lives of autistic adults. It can also be used to increase self-understanding among autistic individuals and allies, as this scale can be used for both autistic and nonautistic adults.

Indexed as

activismattitudesautismneurodiversityscale development

Identifiers

PMID40151656
PMCPMC11937762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.