Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151654›Full record

ArticleAutism in adulthood2025

The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.

Annika M Allen, Joshua A Burk, Cheryl L Dickter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism in adulthood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annika M AllenDepartment of Psychological Sciences, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.
Joshua A BurkDepartment of Psychological Sciences, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.
Cheryl L DickterDepartment of Psychological Sciences, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8876-5582

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autistic adults are perceived more negatively than neurotypical (NT) adults by NT individuals. These negative perceptions can contribute to discrimination toward and social exclusion of autistic adults, which is detrimental to their mental and physical well-being. This study examined whether reading a vignette and imagining an interaction with a peer labeled as autistic would improve implicit and explicit attitudes toward autistic people. Methods: NT adults ( Results: Overall, participants associated autistic terms with negative attributes rather than positive attributes, but those who imagined interacting with an individual labeled as autistic had less negative implicit bias toward autistic people than those who imagined interacting with a person without a label of autism. Explicit bias was not affected by the simulated scenario. When assessing some of the factors that are associated with implicit and explicit attitudes, we found that implicit attitudes and prior contact with autistic individuals were significantly related while controlling for Societal Attitudes towards Autism (SATA), while explicit attitudes were associated with SATA controlling for prior contact. Discussion: These findings suggest that a brief exercise in which participants imagine a positive encounter with a person labeled as autistic can reduce implicit bias toward autistic people.

Indexed as

autismexplicit attitudesimagined contactimplicit attitudesprejudice reduction

Identifiers

PMID40151654
PMCPMC11937770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.