ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Fatty pancreas on EUS: Risk factors, correlation with CT/MRI, and implications for pancreatic cancer screening.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pancreatic Steatosis and Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: From Incidental Imaging Finding to Emerging Risk Marker?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Conceptual framework and expert guidance on intrapancreatic fat deposition: the Melbourne consensus.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer with mismatch repair and microsatellite instability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Association of Liver Steatosis and Non-Alcoholic Pancreatic Steatosis in Very High Cardiovascular Risk.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Fatty Pancreas: Current Evidence, Treatment Implications, and Future Directions.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Fatty pancreas (FP), traditionally perceived as a benign finding, has been undergoing scrutiny lately due to growing evidence linking it to various disease states, including increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS at a single institution from August 2007 to October 2023, conducted by one endosonographer with more than 25 years of experience. Focusing on individuals identified with FP during EUS, we compared these findings with corresponding findings on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) conducted within 3 months or 1 year prior to or following EUS. Results: Ninety-one patients were included and identified as having FP on their EUS exams. The most common indication for EUS was PC screening in high-risk patients (35.16%). At the time of conducting EUS, 65.93% of patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30, 63.73% had hypertension, and 32.96% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Of the 91 patients, 70 had CT or MRI done within 3 months of the EUS date, and only 15 (21.43%) had FP reported on imaging. All 91 patients had CT or MRI within 1 year, and only 16 (17.58%) had FP reported on imaging. Conclusion: Only 21.43% of patients had FP on their CT/MRI within 3 months despite EUS findings, suggesting either lower accuracy of CT/MRI compared to EUS in identifying FP or potential underreporting in a real-world setting, even in a tertiary care center. This discrepancy in reporting is noteworthy considering FP's role as a potential precursor to several important conditions and promoting pancreatic carcinogenesis pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.