Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151596›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Fatty pancreas on EUS: Risk factors, correlation with CT/MRI, and implications for pancreatic cancer screening.

Ramez M Ibrahim, Shantanu Solanki, Wei Qiao, Hyunsoo Hwang, Ben S Singh, Irina M Cazacu, Adrian Saftoiu, Matthew H G Katz, Michael P Kim, Florencia McAllister and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer with mismatch repair and microsatellite instability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ramez M IbrahimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-3908
Shantanu SolankiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Wei QiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hyunsoo HwangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ben S SinghDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Irina M CazacuDepartment of Oncology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Adrian SaftoiuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-8269
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael P KimDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Florencia McAllisterDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Manoop S BhutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-5947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Fatty pancreas (FP), traditionally perceived as a benign finding, has been undergoing scrutiny lately due to growing evidence linking it to various disease states, including increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS at a single institution from August 2007 to October 2023, conducted by one endosonographer with more than 25 years of experience. Focusing on individuals identified with FP during EUS, we compared these findings with corresponding findings on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) conducted within 3 months or 1 year prior to or following EUS. Results: Ninety-one patients were included and identified as having FP on their EUS exams. The most common indication for EUS was PC screening in high-risk patients (35.16%). At the time of conducting EUS, 65.93% of patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30, 63.73% had hypertension, and 32.96% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Of the 91 patients, 70 had CT or MRI done within 3 months of the EUS date, and only 15 (21.43%) had FP reported on imaging. All 91 patients had CT or MRI within 1 year, and only 16 (17.58%) had FP reported on imaging. Conclusion: Only 21.43% of patients had FP on their CT/MRI within 3 months despite EUS findings, suggesting either lower accuracy of CT/MRI compared to EUS in identifying FP or potential underreporting in a real-world setting, even in a tertiary care center. This discrepancy in reporting is noteworthy considering FP's role as a potential precursor to several important conditions and promoting pancreatic carcinogenesis pathways.

Indexed as

computed tomographyEUSFatty pancreasmagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic cancerPancreatic steatosis

Identifiers

PMID40151596
PMCPMC11939939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.