ReviewJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Top 100 Most-Cited Papers on Temporomandibular Disorders in Children: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to analyze the top 100 most-cited articles on temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in children and to identify the most-cited authors, journals, institutions, and countries. Materials and Methods: The publication search was performed using The Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection in May 2023. The terms "TMD" and "Children" were used in the search strategy. The time range considered extends from 1985 to the date of data extraction. No limitations were applied concerning language. For pertinent statistical computation, the finalized facts were transferred into the R environment (R package Bibliometrix version 3.1) and generated relevant graphics and collaborative network mapping. Word co-occurrence in 100 articles was visualized using VOSviewer software. Results: The 100 most influential manuscripts were published between 1991 and 2021. In the years considered, 6987 citations were included in the top 100 papers that were taken into consideration, with an annual mean citation of 215.63. Top contributors to the field were Sweden, the USA, and Brazil. The most-cited studies were produced by the US University of Washington ( Conclusion: To determine the important writers, nations, organizations, and journals in the subject of TMD in children, this study examined the top 100 cited articles in the field with the greatest number of citations. Additionally, the study's hotspots, prospective trends, and state of research were given in TMD in a growing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.