Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151493›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025

The 90% effective dose of ciprofol and propofol with S-ketamine for painless abortion: a randomized, double-blind, sequential dose-finding trial.

Qiang Tao, Qiao Shi, Tao Xu, Shanshan Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiang TaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4914-9382
Qiao ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9602-0303
Tao XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-0382
Shanshan YeDepartment of Anesthesiology, The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 910, Henshan Road, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6907-2203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unlike the propofol-opioids combination, a single dose of S-ketamine with propofol achieves the same anesthetic effects while effectively minimizing adverse reactions in painless abortion. Ciprofol, a novel analog of propofol, has distinct advantages, its application in painless abortion is underexplored. Objectives: To investigate a 90% effective dose (ED Design: This prospective biased coin up-and-down (BCUD) sequential dose-finding study aimed to estimate the ED Methods: Eighty patients were recruited and randomly allocated to either ciprofol or propofol groups, with initial doses of 0.375 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg, respectively. The dose for the subsequent patient in the study was based on the response of the preceding patient, following the BCUD design. The study estimated the ED Results: The ED Conclusion: Compared to propofol and S-ketamine combination, ciprofol and S-ketamine are equally effective with reduced respiratory depression. Thus, clinicians should consider a dose of 0.5 mg/kg ciprofol with 0.15 mg/kg S-ketamine for painless abortion. Trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR2400086522; July 5, 2024.

Indexed as

abortionciprofolpropofolS-ketamine

Identifiers

PMID40151493
PMCPMC11946288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.