ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Effectiveness of health promotion interventions to increase faecal occult blood test uptake rates among older adults with an average-risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mailed Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: The CARES Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Trial
- Colorectal Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Understanding the iFOBT-to-Colonoscopy Gap.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review aims to examine the effectiveness of interventions in increasing faecal occult blood test (FOBT) uptake rates among older adults with an average-risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and to identify essential components of such interventions based on current evidence. Methods: Five databases were included in a systematic literature search for studies reporting randomized controlled trials (RCT) and interventions aimed at increasing FOBT uptake rates among average-risk individuals aged 50-75. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used for conducting meta-analyses and subgroup analyses. Results: A meta-analysis of the 20 included studies demonstrated that health promotion interventions led to significant increases in FOBT uptake rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.30-1.85; Conclusions: Future studies with rigorous methodologies are warranted to examine the effectiveness and understand the mechanisms of theoretical framework-based multi-component educational programmes aimed at increasing FOBT uptake rates. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024520859.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.