ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Adolescent childhood cancer survivors talking about cancer: A socioecological perspective.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Machine Learning Pipeline to Analyze Global Sentiment and Factors Influencing Retinoblastoma Treatment Hesitancy: Observational Infodemiology Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A Minority Within a Minority: Lived Meanings of Cancer Among Arab Young Adults in East Jerusalem.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Heroes in motion - a six-year quality report and patient evaluation of a real-world exercise therapy program in pediatric oncology.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on disclosure of diagnosis and related issues in childhood cancer: A mixed methods systematic review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed (1) to investigate the communication patterns of adolescent childhood cancer survivors (ACCSs), including their motivations, methods, context, and outcomes and (2) to identify factors influencing their cancer-related communication (cancer communication) at each level of the socioecological model. Methods: A qualitative descriptive research design was adopted to explore ACCSs' experiences of communicating about cancer and the factors influencing such experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis. This study was conducted according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Results: The ACCSs were motivated to engage in cancer-related communication by acquiring social support and an altruistic perspective. Although ACCSs rarely initiated cancer-related communication proactively, they communicated with close friends and family members about their cancer experiences. The motivation to communicate with friends shifted from sharing factual information, such as their daily lives in the hospital, to seeking emotional connections shaped by psychosocial development. Dissatisfaction with the limitations of school life and concerns about cancer were primarily discussed with parents. Furthermore, parents' perceptions of cancer and their explanations of the illness to their children appeared to influence the children's perceptions of their cancer experiences and their communication about cancer. Cancer-related communication among ACCSs was influenced by factors at multiple levels. Furthermore, institutional- and community-level factors affected individual and interpersonal factors. Conclusions: A multilayered approach involving ACCSs, parents, educators, school peers, and the broader community is essential for enhancing communication about cancer within this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.