Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151460›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025

Adolescent childhood cancer survivors talking about cancer: A socioecological perspective.

Naoko Honda, Yasutomo Funakoshi, Yuki Matuishi, Kanako Morifuji, Kazuaki Tanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naoko HondaDepartment of Reproductive Health Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yasutomo FunakoshiDepartment of Pediatrics, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuki MatuishiNagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kanako MorifujiDepartment of Reproductive Health Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kazuaki TanabeDepartment of Nursing Science, Graduate School, of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed (1) to investigate the communication patterns of adolescent childhood cancer survivors (ACCSs), including their motivations, methods, context, and outcomes and (2) to identify factors influencing their cancer-related communication (cancer communication) at each level of the socioecological model. Methods: A qualitative descriptive research design was adopted to explore ACCSs' experiences of communicating about cancer and the factors influencing such experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis. This study was conducted according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Results: The ACCSs were motivated to engage in cancer-related communication by acquiring social support and an altruistic perspective. Although ACCSs rarely initiated cancer-related communication proactively, they communicated with close friends and family members about their cancer experiences. The motivation to communicate with friends shifted from sharing factual information, such as their daily lives in the hospital, to seeking emotional connections shaped by psychosocial development. Dissatisfaction with the limitations of school life and concerns about cancer were primarily discussed with parents. Furthermore, parents' perceptions of cancer and their explanations of the illness to their children appeared to influence the children's perceptions of their cancer experiences and their communication about cancer. Cancer-related communication among ACCSs was influenced by factors at multiple levels. Furthermore, institutional- and community-level factors affected individual and interpersonal factors. Conclusions: A multilayered approach involving ACCSs, parents, educators, school peers, and the broader community is essential for enhancing communication about cancer within this population.

Indexed as

AdolescenceChildhood cancer survivorsCommunicationSelf-disclosureSocial ecology

Identifiers

PMID40151460
PMCPMC11946496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.