ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2025
Findings and Recommendations of the RAV3N Applied Biorisk and Biosafety Gap Assessment Workshop.
Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Research Alliance for Veterinary Science and Biodefense BSL-3 Network (RAV3N) convened an "Applied Biorisk and Biosafety Gap Assessment Workshop" held February 9-10, 2023, in Baltimore, Maryland. As the global prevalence, complexity, and severity of infectious and transboundary veterinary diseases and emerging zoonotic diseases are increasing, there is growing recognition and concern that biorisk management data required to understand and counter these threats are lacking. With sponsorship from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of State, RAV3N partnered with Gryphon Scientific and ABSA International to organize, plan, and deliver this biosafety gap analysis workshop. Methods: The workshop brought together U.S. and international subject matter experts on veterinary and agricultural biorisk management from seven different countries to methodically identify, categorize, and assess the most pressing biosafety or biocontainment evidence gaps related to research and diagnostic activities of agricultural and veterinary importance. Results: The workshop findings aligned into the following categories: applied biorisk gap identified and required experiment proposed; research performed, but data not published or shared, mechanisms to share data required; risk assessment tools and process enhancements required; literature review and published summaries required; and additional survey, workshops, and "lessons learned" activities required. RAV3N members further analyzed the original dataset and report 25 prioritized applied biosafety research recommendations of importance to biocontainment facility and veterinary biorisk managers. These recommendations warrant consideration by agencies and policy makers considering funding research to ensure that biorisk management practices and regulations for biocontainment laboratories are evidence-based and built upon the best available science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.