Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151379›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025

Social media impact on societal security.

Huda Hassan Alnaqbi, Eman Ahmed Mohamed Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huda Hassan AlnaqbiDepartment of Sociology, University of Khorfakkan, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Eman Ahmed Mohamed AliDepartment of Sociology, University of Khorfakkan, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the impact of social media on societal security by surveying 191 employees from various demographic backgrounds. Utilizing a structured questionnaire, the research highlights significant social, ethical, and security consequences, with 81.80% of participants reporting social impacts, 84.40% identifying ethical and behavioral effects, and 82.80% noting substantial security concerns. Despite the broad effects, no significant differences were observed based on gender, education, or social media platform usage. However, age-related variations emerged, with younger groups (23-30 and 31-40) reporting more profound effects compared to those aged 41-50. Based on these findings, the study recommends awareness campaigns addressing the risks of social media, the establishment of legal frameworks to enhance societal security, and the creation of a technical and legal support unit for victims of online incidents. The research calls for further qualitative investigations into hacking and damage cases to deepen understanding and guide effective policy measures.

Indexed as

cybercrimesocial mediasocial media impactsocial networkingsocietal security

Identifiers

PMID40151379
PMCPMC11947725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.