ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Association of ultra-processed foods consumption with increased liver steatosis in U.S. adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent studies demonstrated a strong association between dietary habits and liver health, particularly in the development of steatosis and fibrosis. This study aimed to examine the impact of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) on liver health, focusing specifically on their influence on the risks of liver steatosis and fibrosis. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 4,992 participants aged 18 years and older from the 2017-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Dietary intake was assessed using one or two 24-h dietary recalls, and foods were categorized by their processing level using the NOVA classification system. UPFs consumption was measured in grams and divided into quartiles. Liver health was assessed using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) via elastography, to evaluate steatosis and fibrosis, respectively. Linear regression models were applied to assess the relationship between UPFs consumption and liver outcomes, adjusting for sociodemographic (age, sex, ethnicity), lifestyle (alcohol consumption, physical activity), and biomedical factors (liver enzyme levels). Results: Higher UPF intake was significantly associated with increased CAP values, indicating a higher risk of liver steatosis. While liver fibrosis, measured by LSM, was also associated with UPF consumption, this relationship did not reach statistical significance. Multivariate analysis showed that increased UPF consumption did not significantly affect LSM ( Conclusion: These results underscore the adverse impact of UPFs on liver health, particularly by increasing steatosis, while the connection with fibrosis remains less straightforward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.