Review3 Biotech2025
Conventional and cutting-edge advances in plant virus detection: emerging trends and techniques.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nano-enabled RNAi strategies for sustainable citrus protection against viral pathogens.Planta · 2026Review
- From reads to results: comparing Oxford Nanopore to Illumina sequencing for citrus virus surveillance.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the influence of RNA extraction methods on the detection of citrus viruses and viroids.Virology journal · 2025Article
- Aptamers as emerging tools for plant disease management: From biosensing to active modulation.iScience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant viruses pose a significant threat to global agriculture. For a long time, conventional methods including detection based on visual symptoms, host range investigations, electron microscopy, serological assays (e.g., ELISA, Western blotting), and nucleic acid-based techniques (PCR, RT-PCR) have been used for virus identification. With increased sensitivity, speed, and specificity, new technologies like loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), high-throughput sequencing (HTS), nanotechnology-based biosensors, and CRISPR diagnostics have completely changed the way plant viruses are detected. Recent advances in detection techniques integrate artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and the Internet of Things (IoT) for real-time monitoring. Innovations like hyperspectral imaging, deep learning, and cloud-based IoT platforms further support disease identification and surveillance. Nanotechnology-based lateral flow assays and CRISPR-Cas systems provide rapid, field-deployable solutions. Despite these advancements, challenges such as sequence limitations, multiplexing constraints, and environmental concerns remain. Future research should focus on refining portable on-site diagnostic kits, optimizing nanotechnology applications, and enhancing global surveillance systems. Interdisciplinary collaboration across molecular biology, bioinformatics, and engineering is essential to developing scalable, cost-effective solutions for plant virus detection, ensuring agricultural sustainability and ecosystem protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.