ArticleSurgical case reports2025
Robot-Assisted Total Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis with Multiple Colorectal Cancers Using the Hugo RAS System.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExperience with the Hugo RAS system in robot-assisted colorectal surgery is limited. This is particularly noticeable when focusing on complex procedures, such as total proctocolectomy (TPC). This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of using the Hugo RAS system for TPC. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27-year-old woman with multiple colorectal cancers with a background of familial adenomatous polyposis underwent robot-assisted TPC, including lymph node dissection of the entire colorectal region using the Hugo RAS system. The robotic procedure was divided into 3 steps: 1) Trendelenburg position to perform ascending colon complete mesocolic excision (CME) to the hepatic flexure, 2) descending colon CME and total mesorectal excision with D3 lymph node dissection, and 3) flat position to perform central vessel ligation along the superior mesenteric artery. After undocking, the specimen was extracted transanally, and an ileal pouch was constructed from a small laparotomy at the umbilical incision, followed by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The operative time was 632 min, and the estimated blood loss was minimal. The postoperative period was uneventful.
conclusionsRobot-assisted TPC using the Hugo RAS system is safe and feasible. The flexibility of Hugo, which is carried by a modular-type surgical robot with multiple independent arms, enables safe and effective advanced procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.