ArticleJACS Au2025
Integrating Physical Principles with Machine Learning for Predicting Field-Enhanced Catalysis.
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Field-dipole interactions can tune the energetics of polarized species over catalyst nanoparticles (NPs) for sustainable technologies. This can boost the energy efficiency of desired reactions by several orders of magnitude compared with conventional heating. However, the local electric field accumulation over the NPs sharp points and field-dependent adsorption over NPs are not well studied, and the associated computational expense is immense. To address this challenge, we introduce an innovative approach that combines density functional theory (DFT) calculations, DFT-based CO vibrational Stark effects, and physics principles enhanced machine learning (ML). This approach enables precise mapping of local electric fields and integrates the physical principles of the first-order Taylor expansion as a training input into the ML model for predicting field-dependent adsorption, facilitating rapid prediction of field-dependent adsorption energetics with acceptable accuracies, particularly when training data sets are limited. Our methodology reveals the dominant roles of external electric field (EEF), the generalized coordination number (GCN), and NP size in determining the local electric field (LEF) strength. Low-coordinated sites and small NPs size enhanced the LEF by about 4-fold compared to the flat surfaces. Using ML models, we can predict the field-driven adsorption energetics at a given adsorption site of the NPs with high accuracy and efficiency. The integration of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.