Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40151203›Full record

ArticleComputer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision2025

AddBiomechanics Dataset: Capturing the Physics of Human Motion at Scale.

Keenon Werling, Janelle Kaneda, Tian Tan, Rishi Agarwal, Six Skov, Tom Van Wouwe, Scott Uhlrich, Nicholas Bianco, Carmichael Ong, Antoine Falisse and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-Modal Sensing for Propulsion Estimation in People Post-Stroke Across Speeds.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Keenon WerlingStanford University.
Janelle KanedaStanford University.
Tian TanStanford University.
Rishi AgarwalStanford University.
Six SkovStanford University.
Tom Van WouweStanford University.
Scott UhlrichStanford University.
Nicholas BiancoStanford University.
Carmichael OngStanford University.
Antoine FalisseStanford University.
Shardul SapkotaStanford University.
Aidan ChandraStanford University.
Joshua CarterUniversity of Bath.
Ezio PreatoniUniversity of Bath.
Benjamin FreglyRice University.
Jennifer HicksStanford University.
Scott DelpStanford University.
C Karen LiuStanford University.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
AddBiomechanics: Automatic Processing and Sharing of Human Movement DataR01LM014154 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Cheng-yun Karen Liu · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While reconstructing human poses in 3D from inexpensive sensors has advanced significantly in recent years, quantifying the dynamics of human motion, including the muscle-generated joint torques and external forces, remains a challenge. Prior attempts to estimate physics from reconstructed human poses have been hampered by a lack of datasets with high-quality pose and force data for a variety of movements. We present the

Indexed as

benchmarkdatasethuman body motionhuman body physicsreal to sim

Identifiers

PMID40151203
PMCPMC11948690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.