ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2025
3D printed scaffolds with multistage osteogenic activity for bone defect repair.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional Shape-Memory Polyurethane/MnOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Synergistic 3D-bioprinted scaffold with multi-level adaptability for vascularized bone regeneration via osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Three-dimensionally-printed biphasic PCL/Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Regulation of calcium delivery and pore structure via osteoinductive microspheres of HA/CS/PGCL for orbital bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Biomimetic periosteum combining BMP-2-loaded M2 macrophage-derived exosomes for enhanced bone defect repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Electrospinning for Mimicking Bioelectric Microenvironment in Tissue Regeneration.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bone defect repair is a complex process including immune regulation, stem cell osteogenic differentiation and extracellular matrix mineralization. Current bone tissue engineering approaches often fail to adapt throughout the above osteogenic process, resulting in suboptimal repair outcomes. To address this problem, a 3D-printed scaffold with multistage osteogenic activity based on shape-memory elastomer and electroactive material is developed. The scaffold exhibits excellent shape memory performance and can trigger shape recovery by physiological temperature. The physiological temperature-triggered shape-memory behavior makes the scaffold promising for minimally invasive implantation. After electric field polarization, the scaffold's surface carries the negative charge, which can activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to promote the polarization of macrophages to M2 phenotype and activate the FAK/ERK signaling pathway to promote osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), indicating that the scaffold can effectively participate in immune microenvironment regulation and stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Additionally, the negative charge on the scaffold's surface can attract calcium and phosphate ions, forming a mineralized matrix and promoting late-stage extracellular matrix mineralization by continuously supplying mineralizing ions such as calcium and phosphate. Overall, this study introduces a 3D-printed scaffold with multistage osteogenic activity, offering a promising strategy for bone defect repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.