ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025
Unveiling the secrets of the profunda femoris artery: A cadaveric journey with morphometric insights.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Profunda femoris artery (PFA), a branch of femoral artery primarily supplies blood to skin, muscles of the inner thigh and proximal femur and plays a significant role in collateral blood supply. This study aimed to investigate the origin, branching pattern and morphometries of PFA in cadavers. Material and Methods: Lower limbs of male and female cadavers (n=41) were analyzed for origin of PFA, lateral circumflex artery (LCFA) and medial circumflex artery (MCFA), distance from mid-inguinal point, course, branching pattern and their external calibers. Data were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS. Results: The PFA showed origins that are posterolateral, posteromedial, and posterior. The distance between PFA and the midpoint of the inguinal ligament was (L=3.7-6.2; mean =5.19±0.7 cm; R=3.2-6.2 cm, mean =4.74±0.9 cm). The origin of MCFA was medial (R=61%, L=52%) and posteromedial (R=39%, L=48%); LCFA was lateral (R=100%, L=78%) and posterolateral (R=0%, L=22%). The average diameter of PFA, MCFA, & LCFA was (L=5.04, 2.9, 2.8 cm and R=5.4, 3.09, 3.71 cm). The paired t-test with a significant p-value (95% confidence) demonstrated that differences in the diameters of the arteries at the specified levels between the left and right limbs could have clinical implications, such as differences in blood flow or susceptibility to vascular conditions. Conclusion: To reduce intra-operative and post-operative complications in the femoral region branches during diagnostic and surgical procedures, it is essential to comprehend the normal and variant positions and distances of the PFA's origin and its circumflex branches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.