ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025
Prediction of Skeletal Age Through Cervical Vertebral Measurements Using Different Machine Learning Regression Methods.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated prediction of hand-wrist maturation stage from lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs using a deep learning approach.European journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Article
- Growth Prediction in Orthodontics: ASystematic Review of Past Methods up to Artificial Intelligence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare skeletal ages determined using three different regression methods from measurements made on cervical vertebrae from lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs) with the skeletal age determined from hand-wrist radiographs (HWRs). Methods: LCRs and HWRs of 794 individuals (329 boys, 465 girls) aged 7-18 years were examined. The hand-wrist skeletal age of the participants was determined using the Greulich-Pyle (GP) atlas. Forty-four linear and nine angular morphometric measurements in the C2-C5 vertebrae were made in LCRs. Vertebral skeletal age (VSA) was determined in both sexes using Ridge, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and ElasticNet regression methods. The study results were evaluated using R2 (explainability power). Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine the consistency of chronologic age (CA), GP age, and VSAs. Results: LASSO regression showed the highest explainability power for VSA, with boys at 0.783 and girls at 0.741. In both sexes, the vertebral depth of concavities had high beta coefficients, and the posterior height of C3 vertebrae (TVup-TVlp) had the highest beta coefficient in boys in LASSO regression. The width of the limits of agreement in both CA and VSA graphs of GP age was wider in boys than in girls. The width of the limits of agreement of CA-VSAs was wider in girls than in boys. Conclusion: Although high R2 values were obtained, VSA showed no superiority over CA in the assessment of skeletal age, and no significant clinical advantage was observed. For the Turkish population, using GP age may be more accurate for determining skeletal age in orthodontic treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.