ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025
Gender-based Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway Between Class I and Class III Patients During MP3cap Growth Period.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the pharyngeal airway size and area between Class III patients exhibiting optimal vertical growth direction and Class I patients at the MP3cap stage, considering gender differences. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed pre-treatment cephalograms of a total of 180 patients with Class I (45 girls, 45 boys) and Class III (maxilla or maxillo-mandibular origin) (45 girls, 45 boys) malocclusions. Linear and angular measurements were conducted on lateral cephalograms utilizing the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP 2.10.18, NY, USA; https://www.gimp.org/). The pharyngeal airway areas were computed utilizing AUTOCAD (Autodesk 2018, San Rafael, CA, USA). The Independent Samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were employed for comparative analysis of variables across groups. The forward selection method was employed in conjunction with regression analysis. Results: No significant differences were observed in the nasopharyngeal area (NA; mm Conclusion: The findings indicate the necessity of accounting for gender-specific variations in Class I and III patients, as well as evaluating pharyngeal airway characteristics in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. In Class III girls, the OA and RG areas, as well as the superior and inferior pharyngeal spaces, were larger compared to Class III boys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.