Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150849›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2025

Gender-based Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway Between Class I and Class III Patients During MP3cap Growth Period.

Merve Kurnaz, Bülent Çelik, Emine Kaygısız

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Merve Kurnazİstanbul Kent University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2945-755X
Bülent ÇelikGazi University Faculty of Sciences, Department of Statistics, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0481-4808
Emine KaygısızPrivate Practice, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2087-7048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the pharyngeal airway size and area between Class III patients exhibiting optimal vertical growth direction and Class I patients at the MP3cap stage, considering gender differences. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed pre-treatment cephalograms of a total of 180 patients with Class I (45 girls, 45 boys) and Class III (maxilla or maxillo-mandibular origin) (45 girls, 45 boys) malocclusions. Linear and angular measurements were conducted on lateral cephalograms utilizing the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP 2.10.18, NY, USA; https://www.gimp.org/). The pharyngeal airway areas were computed utilizing AUTOCAD (Autodesk 2018, San Rafael, CA, USA). The Independent Samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were employed for comparative analysis of variables across groups. The forward selection method was employed in conjunction with regression analysis. Results: No significant differences were observed in the nasopharyngeal area (NA; mm Conclusion: The findings indicate the necessity of accounting for gender-specific variations in Class I and III patients, as well as evaluating pharyngeal airway characteristics in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. In Class III girls, the OA and RG areas, as well as the superior and inferior pharyngeal spaces, were larger compared to Class III boys.

Indexed as

AirwayClass IClass III malocclusionpharyngeal

Identifiers

PMID40150849
PMCPMC11976325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.