Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150842›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

Survivor-driven development of a PROM for use in routine colorectal cancer care.

Johanne D Lyhne, Lise Gade, Laila Hansen, Anne Johansen, Allan 'Ben' Smith, Lars Henrik Jensen, Lise Ventzel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07281820 (FRAME), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07281820 narecruitingnot on this map

FRAME (Focused Recognition, Assessment and Management of Late Effects): A Single-Center Implementation Study Using RE-AIM to Guide Evaluation in the Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorVejle HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsCancer, Late EffectsArmsFRAME model (questionnaire + dialogue + management plan)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanne D LyhneDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark. johanne.dam.lyhne@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-2566-663X
Lise GadeSurvivor Representative, colorectal cancer survivor, Denmark.
Laila HansenSurvivor Representative, colorectal cancer survivor, Denmark.
Anne JohansenMunicipality of Vejle, Denmark.
Allan 'Ben' SmithThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-7369
Lars Henrik JensenDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark; Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0020-1537
Lise VentzelDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark; Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6847-0290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDespite the availability of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) for assessing survivorship care needs, their successful implementation remains limited. This study aimed to improve the likelihood of implementation success by actively engaging end-users in developing a PROM designed to address implementation barriers. PATIENTS AND

methodsSelected barriers for implementation were: (1) PROMs do not adequately address relevant issues, (2) PROMs can inhibit patient-clinician interaction, and (3) PROMs are not suitable for all patients. Management of these barriers were discussed at two 1-day workshops at Vejle Hospital with in-person attendance by colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and informal caregivers (ICs). Relevant issues of CRC survivorship care (barrier 1) were defined based on data from four distinct sources. Solutions to overcoming barriers 2 and 3 were discussed at the workshops. Workshop data were guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) guide.

resultsThe four distinct sources provided data from 4,545 CRC survivors. Thirteen individuals attended the in-person workshops. The following constructs were identified as relevant (barrier 1): self-rated well-being relative to pre-diagnosis, late effects encompassing both psychological and physical aspects, the role of caregivers, identity considerations, support systems, economic impacts, rehabilitation needs, and information provision. Specific element (e.g., keywords, prioritisation and agenda-setting) were incorporated to facilitate patient-clinician interactions (barrier 2). All constructs were considered relevant across all stages of CRC survivorship (barrier 3). The final PROM comprised 34 items.

interpretationThis dialogue-tool is designed to address implementation barriers by providing direct feedback on relevant late effects and supportive care needs from CRC survivors to clinicians.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40150842
PMCPMC11980947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.