ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Investigation of the Effects of 3D Printing Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Bone Scaffolds: Experimental Study Integrated with Artificial Neural Networks.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Printing Parameters and Nozzle Diameter on the Effective Microarchitecture and Compressive Modulus of Gyroid PCL Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Molecular Weight-Driven Tunable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels Modulate Immune Polarization in Three-Dimensional Microenvironments.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- Innovative prospects in 3D printed bio-scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Advanced additive manufacturing in orthopedics: a comprehensive review of biomaterials, structural design, biological functions and clinical technology applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Article
- AI-driven biomaterial design: an intelligent closed loop from reverse design to biological response.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scaffolds are critical in regenerative medicine, particularly in bone tissue engineering, where they mimic the extracellular matrix to support tissue regeneration. Scaffold efficacy depends on precise control of 3D printing parameters, which determine geometric and mechanical properties, including Young's modulus. This study examines the impact of nozzle temperature, printing speed, and feed rate on the Young's modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds. Using a Prusa MINI+ 3D printer (Prusa Research a.s., Prague, Czech Republic), systematic experiments are conducted to explore these correlations. Results show that higher nozzle temperatures decrease Young's modulus due to reduced viscosity and weaker interlayer bonding, likely caused by thermal degradation and reduced crystallinity. Printing speed exhibits an optimal range, with Young's modulus peaking at moderate speeds (around 2100 mm/min), suggesting a balance that enhances crystallinity and bonding. Material feed rate positively correlates with Young's modulus, with increased material deposition improving scaffold density and strength. The integration of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model further optimized the printing parameters, successfully predicting the maximum Young's modulus while maintaining geometric constraints. Notably, the Young's modulus achieved falls within the typical range for cancellous bone, indicating the model's potential to meet specific clinical requirements. These findings offer valuable insights for designing patient-specific bone scaffolds, potentially improving clinical outcomes in bone repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.