Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150776›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Characterizing Protein Corona, Nanobiological Interactions, and Advancing Drug Discovery.

Turkan Kopac

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Leveraging AI for cell biology discovery.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Turkan KopacDepartment of Chemistry, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67100 Zonguldak, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-7987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are essential for all living organisms, playing key roles in biochemical reactions, structural support, signal transduction, and gene regulation. Their importance in biomedical research is highlighted by their role as drug targets in various diseases. The interactions between proteins and nanoparticles (NPs), including the protein corona's formation, significantly affect NP behavior, biodistribution, cellular uptake, and toxicity. Comprehending these interactions is pivotal for advancing the design of NPs to augment their efficacy and safety in biomedical applications. While traditional nanomedicine design relies heavily on experimental work, the use of data science and machine learning (ML) is on the rise to predict the synthesis and behavior of nanomaterials (NMs). Nanoinformatics combines computational simulations with laboratory studies, assessing risks and revealing complex nanobio interactions. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and ML are enhancing the characterization of the protein corona and improving drug discovery. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of these approaches and stresses the importance of comprehensive datasets for better model accuracy. Future developments may include advanced deep-learning models and multimodal data integration to enhance protein function prediction. Overall, systematic research and advanced computational tools are vital for improving therapeutic outcomes and ensuring the safe use of NMs in medicine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedrug discoverymachine learningnanobio interactionsnanomedicinesprotein coronaprotein–protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID40150776
PMCPMC11939375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.