ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A New Method Proposed for Analyzing Airflow Dynamics in Negative Pressure Isolation Chambers Using Particle Image Velocimetry.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Portable, Foldable Negative-Pressure Aerosol-Containment System (FNPACS) for Aerosol Control During Aerosol-Generating Procedures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced Aerosol Containment Performance of a Negative Pressure Hood with an Aerodynamic Cap Design: Multi-Method Validation Using CFD, PAO Particles, and Microbial Testing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significant infection risks posed by aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). We developed a hood that covers the patient's respiratory area, incorporating a negative pressure system to contain aerosols. This study analyzed the movement and containment of aerosols within a developed negative pressure isolation chamber. Using particle image velocimetry (PIV) technology, in the optimized design, the characteristics of aerosols were analyzed under both negative and non-negative pressure conditions. The results demonstrated that in the absence of negative pressure, droplets dispersed widely, with diffusion angles ranging from 26.9° to 34.2°, significantly increasing the risk of external leakage. When negative pressure was applied, the diffusion angles narrowed to 20.0-35.1° and inward airflow effectively directed droplets away from the chamber boundary, preventing external dispersion. Additionally, sensor data measuring particle concentrations confirmed that droplets smaller than 10 µm were fully contained under negative pressure, strongly supporting the chamber's effectiveness. The strong agreement between PIV flow patterns and sensor measurements underscores the reliability of the experimental methodology. These findings highlight the chamber's ability to suppress external leakage while offering superior flexibility and portability compared to conventional isolation systems, making it ideal for emergency responses, mobile healthcare units, and large-scale infectious disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.