ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Integrated Machine Learning Algorithms-Enhanced Predication for Cervical Cancer from Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver Cancer: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Integrated Therapeutic Approaches.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cervical Cancer Biomarkers in Non-Cervical Samples: Emerging Tools for Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis is critical for improving outcomes in cancer patients; however, the application of diagnostic markers derived from serum proteomic screening remains challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI), encompassing deep learning and machine learning (ML), has gained increasing prominence across various scientific disciplines. In this study, we utilized cervical cancer (CC) as a model to develop an AI-driven pipeline for the identification and validation of serum biomarkers for early cancer diagnosis, leveraging mass spectrometry-based proteomics data. By processing and normalizing serum polypeptide differential peaks from 240 patients, we employed eight distinct ML algorithms to classify and analyze these differential polypeptide peaks, subsequently constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and confusion matrices. Key performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, were systematically evaluated. Furthermore, by integrating feature importance values, Shapley values, and local interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) values, we demonstrated that the diagnostic area under the curve (AUC) achieved by our multi-dimensional learning models approached 1, significantly outperforming the diagnostic AUC of single markers derived from the PRIDE database. These findings underscore the potential of proteomics-driven integrated machine learning as a robust strategy to enhance early cancer diagnosis, offering a promising avenue for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.