ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
GCBRGCN: Integration of ceRNA and RGCN to Identify Gastric Cancer Biomarkers.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress of machine learning applications in gastric cancer diagnosis and therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Global research trends on the association between gastric cancer and chronic atrophic gastritis: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent malignancy, and the discovery of biomarkers plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and prognosis of GC. However, current strategies for identifying GC biomarkers often focus on a single ribonucleic acid (RNA) class, neglecting the potential for multiple RNA types to collectively serve as biomarkers with improved predictive capabilities. To bridge this gap, our study introduces the GC biomarker relation graph convolution neural network (GCBRGCN) model which integrates the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network with GC clinical informations and whole transcriptomics data, leveraging the relational graph convolutional network (RGCN) to predict GC biomarkers. It demonstrates exceptional performance, surpassing traditional machine learning and graph neural network algorithms with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8172 in the task of predicting GC biomarkers. Our study identified three unreported potential novel GC biomarkers: CCNG1, CYP1B1, and CITED2. Moreover, FOXC1 and LINC00324 were characterized as biomarkers with significance in both prognosis and diagnosis. Our work offers a novel framework for GC biomarker identification, highlighting the critical role of multiple types RNA interaction in oncological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.