Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150719›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

GCBRGCN: Integration of ceRNA and RGCN to Identify Gastric Cancer Biomarkers.

Peng Zhi, Yue Liu, Chenghui Zhao, Kunlun He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research progress of machine learning applications in gastric cancer diagnosis and therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peng ZhiChinese PLA Medical School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Yue LiuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Denfense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Chenghui ZhaoMedical Innovation Research Department of PLA General Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Kunlun HeMedical Innovation Research Department of PLA General Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-5700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent malignancy, and the discovery of biomarkers plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and prognosis of GC. However, current strategies for identifying GC biomarkers often focus on a single ribonucleic acid (RNA) class, neglecting the potential for multiple RNA types to collectively serve as biomarkers with improved predictive capabilities. To bridge this gap, our study introduces the GC biomarker relation graph convolution neural network (GCBRGCN) model which integrates the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network with GC clinical informations and whole transcriptomics data, leveraging the relational graph convolutional network (RGCN) to predict GC biomarkers. It demonstrates exceptional performance, surpassing traditional machine learning and graph neural network algorithms with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8172 in the task of predicting GC biomarkers. Our study identified three unreported potential novel GC biomarkers: CCNG1, CYP1B1, and CITED2. Moreover, FOXC1 and LINC00324 were characterized as biomarkers with significance in both prognosis and diagnosis. Our work offers a novel framework for GC biomarker identification, highlighting the critical role of multiple types RNA interaction in oncological research.

Indexed as

biomarkercompeting endogenous RNAgastric cancerrelational graph convolutional network

Identifiers

PMID40150719
PMCPMC11939766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.