Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150713›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Medical 3D Printing Using Material Jetting: Technology Overview, Medical Applications, and Challenges.

Shivum Chokshi, Raghav Gangatirkar, Anish Kandi, Maria DeLeonibus, Mohamed Kamel, Seetharam Chadalavada, Rajul Gupta, Harshitha Munigala, Karthik Tappa, Shayne Kondor and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shivum ChokshiDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Raghav GangatirkarDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Anish KandiDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Maria DeLeonibusDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Mohamed KamelDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Seetharam ChadalavadaDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Rajul GuptaDepartment of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6251-3449
Harshitha MunigalaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Karthik TappaDepartment of Breast Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-8665
Shayne KondorDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Michael B BurchDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Prashanth RaviDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Material Jetting (MJT) 3D printing (3DP) is a specific technology that deposits photocurable droplets of material and colored inks to fabricate objects layer-by-layer. The high resolution and full color capability render MJT 3DP an ideal technology for 3DP in medicine as evidenced by the 3DP literature. The technology has been adopted globally across the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Australia. While MJT 3D printers can be expensive, their ability to fabricate highly accurate and multi-color parts provides a lucrative opportunity in the creation of advanced prototypes and medical models. The literature on MJT 3DP has expanded greatly as of late, in part aided by the lowering costs of the technology, and this report is the first review to document the applications of MJT in medicine. Additionally, this report portrays the technological information behind MJT 3DP, cases involving fabricated MJT 3DP models from the University of Cincinnati 3DP lab, as well as the challenges of MJT in a clinical setting, including cost, expertise in managing the machines, and scalability issues. It is expected that MJT 3DP, as imaging and segmentation technologies undergo future improvement, will be best poised with representing the voxel-level-variations captured by radiologic-image-sets due to its capacity for voxel-level-control.

Indexed as

anatomic modelsmaterial jettingmedical 3D printingmedical devicespoint-of-care additive manufacturingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40150713
PMCPMC11939548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.