ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring Lower Limb Biomechanical Differences in Competitive Aerobics Athletes of Different Ability Levels During Rotational Jump Landings.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Field-based and laboratory monitoring tools in aerobic gymnastics: a scoping review of measurement properties, physiological relevance, and change following training or competitive exposure.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Physical fitness and training factors associated with injury risk in aerobic gymnastics: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Expertise shapes the kinematic and electromyographic characteristics of on-ice side-cutting in elite versus beginner ice hockey players.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Construction and application of a model for predicting athletes' injury risk based on machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Does shoe cushioning space affect patellofemoral pain risk? A study based on the integrated finite element model.iScience · 2025Article
- What are the differences between on-ice and off-ice side-cutting maneuver? A kinematic and electromyographic comparative analysis of ice hockey players.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-level (HL) and low-level (LL) competitive aerobics athletes demonstrate different landing patterns during rotational jump landings, resulting in differing risks of lower limb injuries. This research aimed to investigate biomechanical differences between different levels of competitive aerobics athletes during rotational jump landings. The subjects included 15 male HL athletes and 15 LL athletes. This study captured kinematics, kinetics, muscle activation, and muscle force data, calculating joint stiffness, energy dissipation, anterior tibial shear force (ATSF), and patellofemoral joint contact force (PTF). LL athletes demonstrated significantly greater ankle dorsiflexion, inversion, and internal rotation angles; knee abduction angle and moment, internal rotation angle and moment; and smaller ankle plantarflexion moment and knee flexion angle. They also showed lower calf muscle coactivation, PTF, joint stiffness at the knee and hip, and the energy dissipation of the ankle and lower limb; greater thigh muscle coactivation and ATSF. The results show that LL athletes exhibit poorer stability at the ankle and knee joints, with a higher risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ankle inversion injuries during rotational jump landings. To lower these risks, LL athletes should increase the flexion angle of the knee, hip, and ankle plantarflexion during landing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.