ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Key Gaps in the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity in Children and Adolescents: A Critical Appraisal of Clinical Guidelines.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Traditional Chinese Medicine for childhood obesity: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe worldwide increase in the prevalence of childhood obesity necessitates effective prevention and treatment strategies. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offer guidance, but significant heterogeneity or lack of practical application exists in their recommendations. The purpose of the present study is to provide an expert, comprehensive, and comparative analysis of gaps in current CPGs for the prevention and treatment of obesity in children and adolescents.
resultsA total of 14 CPGs were identified, focusing on childhood obesity prevention (n = 11), treatment (n = 9), or both (n = 6). Prevention CPGs generally recommend body mass index (BMI) assessment, but specific measurement frequency is often absent. While some provide age-specific dietary recommendations, graphical tools are lacking. Recommendations for increased physical activity and reduced screen time are common, but age-stratified guidance is deficient. Furthermore, recommendations regarding mental health and sleep are notably absent. Treatment CPGs utilize BMI for obesity diagnosis, but inconsistencies in cut-off points persist. Comorbidity assessment is generally recommended, yet age-specific guidance remains lacking. Dietary recommendations are present in most CPGs, but many lack detailed specifications (e.g., meal frequency, portion sizes, macronutrient distribution, age-appropriate examples). Most CPGs advocate for 60 min of daily physical activity and limit screen time to 2 h per day. Recommendations concerning sleep are consistently absent. While parental involvement is acknowledged, specific guidance for active participation in prevention and treatment is deficient. Pharmacological treatment options are frequently outdated, and surgical intervention is reserved for exceptional cases of severe obesity.
conclusionsStandardizing BMI cut-off points and defining age groups across CPGs would improve consistency and comparability in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of childhood obesity. Tailoring recommendations for diet, physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep to specific age groups would ensure developmentally appropriate interventions. A stronger emphasis on early prevention strategies is needed to address the root causes of obesity. Clear guidance for parents and families would facilitate their active engagement in prevention and treatment. Up-to-date information regarding pharmacological and surgical treatments is imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.