The Psychometric Properties of the ACE-IQ Questionnaire's Binary and Frequency Scoring Methods in a Chilean Community Sample.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Quality of Instruments for Assessing Adverse Childhood Experiences.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Review
2. Childhood adversity, benevolent experiences, and perceived stress among pregnant women in Mexico: psychosocial determinants of maternal well-being in a middle-income setting.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026
   Observational
3. Impact of alexithymia as a mediator in the relationship between early traumatic experiences and emotion regulation difficulties in young adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
   Article
4. Silent scars: understanding interpersonal sensitivity, paranoid ideation, and hostility from adverse childhood experiences in Jamaica.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as