ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automatic Movement Recognition for Evaluating the Gross Motor Development of Infants.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Methods in Posture-Related Applications in Children up to 12 Years Old: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to early-detect gross motor abnormalities through video detection in Taiwanese infants aged 2-6 months.
backgroundThe current diagnosis of infant developmental delays primarily relies on clinical examinations. However, during clinical visits, infants may show atypical behaviors due to unfamiliar environments, which might not truly reflect their true developmental status.
methodsThis study utilized videos of infants recorded in their home environments. Two pediatric neurologists manually annotated these clips to identify whether an infant possessed the characteristics of gross motor delays through an assessment of his/her gross motor movements. Using transfer learning techniques, four pose recognition models, including ViTPose, HRNet, DARK, and UDP, were applied to the infant gross motor dataset. Four machine learning classification models, including random forest, support vector machine, logistic regression, and XGBoost, were used to predict the developmental status of infants.
resultsThe experimental results of pose estimation and tracking indicate that the ViTPose model provided the best performance for pose recognition. A total of 227 features related to kinematics, motions, and postures were extracted and calculated. A one-way ANOVA analysis revealed 106 significant features that were retained for constructing prediction models. The results show that a random forest model achieved the best performance with an average F1-score of 0.94, a weighted average AUC of 0.98, and an average accuracy of 94%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.