Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150589›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Congenital Heart Disease.

Áine Lynch, Aamir Jeewa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Áine LynchDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4668-4941
Aamir JeewaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2878-6554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As early survival outcomes have improved, heart failure in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) has become a growing problem. Primary care providers and pediatricians are thus encountering increasing numbers of children with or at-risk for heart failure. Despite medication, many of these children progress to end-stage heart failure and require heart transplant for long-term survival. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly utilized to support this cohort both acutely when recovery is anticipated, and as a bridge to transplant. Early referral to tertiary heart failure and MCS teams is key to facilitate timely institution of MCS and preserve end-organ function. MCS in children with CHD presents unique challenges due to patient size and complex intra- and extra-cardiac anatomy. Evaluations for MCS should take into account patient size, anatomy, end-organ function, and psychosocial supports. The form of MCS utilized is dependent on clinical urgency, patient size, and anatomy. We describe the evolving landscape of MCS in pediatric patients with CHD.

Indexed as

congenital heart diseasemechanical circulatory supportpediatric heart failureventricular assist device

Identifiers

PMID40150589
PMCPMC11941418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.