ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Congenital Heart Disease.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geospatial disparities in pediatric heart failure care in China: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As early survival outcomes have improved, heart failure in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) has become a growing problem. Primary care providers and pediatricians are thus encountering increasing numbers of children with or at-risk for heart failure. Despite medication, many of these children progress to end-stage heart failure and require heart transplant for long-term survival. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly utilized to support this cohort both acutely when recovery is anticipated, and as a bridge to transplant. Early referral to tertiary heart failure and MCS teams is key to facilitate timely institution of MCS and preserve end-organ function. MCS in children with CHD presents unique challenges due to patient size and complex intra- and extra-cardiac anatomy. Evaluations for MCS should take into account patient size, anatomy, end-organ function, and psychosocial supports. The form of MCS utilized is dependent on clinical urgency, patient size, and anatomy. We describe the evolving landscape of MCS in pediatric patients with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.