ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancements in Digital Cytopathology Since COVID-19: Insights from a Narrative Review of Review Articles.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Augmented Cytopathologist: A Conceptual Exploratory Narrative Review on Immersive and Vision-Language Models Tools in Digital Pathology.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Practice of Cytopathology in Korea: A 40-Year Evolution Through Standardization, Digital Transformation, and Global Partnership.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Review
- Integration of Digital Cytology in Quality Assurance Programs for Cytopathology.Acta cytologica · 2026Review
- Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Morphology, WHO 2022 Grading, and Prognostic Perspectives.Cureus · 2026Review
- Pathologists' user experience in the era of digital pathology: a KAP study in a region of emerging digitization.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- The new normal: Simultaneous temporal increases in workload and physician well-being experienced by Stanford pathology in a transformed work environment.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.