Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150380›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Even Low Amounts of Amorphous Lignocellulose Affect Some Upper Gut Parameters, but They Do Not Modify Ileal Microbiota in Young Broiler Chickens.

Valéria Farkas, András Mayer, Judit Poór, Eszter Péterné Farkas, Kesete Goitom Tewelde, Brigitta Kiss, Nikoletta Such, László Pál, Gábor Csitári, Károly Dublecz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Supplementation of nanoencapsulatedOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Valéria FarkasInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4692-5813
András MayerInstitute of Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Guba Sándor Street 40, 7400 Kaposvár, Hungary.
Judit PoórInstitute of Mathematics and Basic Science, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.
Eszter Péterné FarkasInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.
Kesete Goitom TeweldeInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0008-1976-2132
Brigitta KissInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.
Nikoletta SuchInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5182-7823
László PálInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9838-6703
Gábor CsitáriInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-0706
Károly DubleczInstitute of Physiology and Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Georgikon Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Deák Ferenc Street 16, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6913-219X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A feeding trial was carried out using 576 Ross 308 male chickens to test the effects of an amorphous lignocellulose (LC) product (Arbocel). Three dietary treatments (control, 0.5% LC (LC 0.5), and 0.8% LC (LC 0.8) were used, and the diets were fed in eight replicate pens of 24 chickens. The LC treatments did not modify the weight gain of the chickens, but they tended to decrease the feed intake and FCR in the grower phase. The high swelling characteristics of LC resulted in lower dry matter (DM) contents in the crop

Indexed as

amorphous fiberbroiler chickenintestine functionmicrobiotaproduction traits

Identifiers

PMID40150380
PMCPMC11939377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.