ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Analysis of Cattle Foot Lesions Recorded at Trimming in the Southwest of England.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe UK has a high incidence of lameness in cattle, which is costly in terms of economics and welfare. Most causes of bovine lameness originate in the foot but there are several different conditions causing lameness. Quantifying the relative prevalence of different lameness causing lesions allows for the focus of preventative measures and research on the most common conditions.
methodsThis study analysed trimming records from 23 professional foot trimmers working in the Southwest of England. A total of 97,944 recorded lesions over a 5-year period were analysed for lesion identity, lesion severity, repeat presentation, foot affected, claw affected and whether they were from dairy or beef cattle.
resultsThe most frequently recorded lesions were digital dermatitis (32%), white line disease (21%), sole ulcer (19%) and sole haemorrhage (13%). White line disease had the highest percentage of lesions requiring veterinary attention and most frequently re-presented. Most lesions were in hind feet and there was a small but significantly greater number recorded in right feet. Beef cattle had a higher percentage of digital dermatitis and lower percentage of sole ulcer compared with dairy cattle.
conclusionsDigital dermatitis was the most common foot lesion of all cattle types. Most feet with lesions only appeared in the data set once, suggesting broadly that foot trimming was largely effective at resolving new foot lesions. More white line lesions were re-presented, along with having more severe grades compared with other lesions. Therapeutic trimming of chronic lesions appeared to be less successful, with re-presentations, on average, every 93 days, compromising welfare for extended periods, and requiring consideration of different veterinary treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.