Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150353›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Come out of Your Shell-A Comparative Pilot Study for Teaching the Central Plastrotomy in Chelonians Using a 3D-Printed Simulator and a Virtual 3D Simulation.

Marie-Therese Knoll, Andrea Tipold, Michael Pees, Sandra Wissing, Johannes Hetterich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie-Therese KnollClinical Skills Lab, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-4654-3380
Andrea TipoldDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Neurology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-942X
Michael PeesDepartment of Small Mammal, Reptile and Avian Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7244-9697
Sandra WissingClinical Skills Lab, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-3795-4462
Johannes HetterichDepartment of Small Mammal, Reptile and Avian Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8997-5944

Funding

Stiftung Innovation in der Hochschullehre FMM2020-99 220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pilot study was conducted with 5th-8th semester students comparing a 3D-printed simulator and a virtual 3D simulation. This study's aim was the comparison of these two resources in three different settings. Assessment of the resources' suitability as teaching devices for performing a central plastrotomy in chelonians took place. One group used the simulator, while the other group used the simulation to practice this method in a preparation course. Afterwards, the practical skills of 28 students were validated in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The students evaluated their respective resources (simulator and simulation). Additionally, 10 practicing veterinarians evaluated the simulator and rated its fidelity as suitable for practicing a plastrotomy. Furthermore, the self-efficacy of the two student groups was compared with each other. An increase in subjective self-assessment of skills in both groups was identified. Students trained on the simulator achieved better results in the OSCE and self-assessment of skills than those trained with the simulation. However, the differences between the groups regarding these aspects were mostly not significant. This study indicates that a 3D-printed chelonian simulator serves as an appropriate teaching device for veterinary students and is a useful addition to established teaching methods, like using cadavers.

Indexed as

3D printing3D simulationcentral plastrotomycheloniansclinical skillsreptilestransplastron coeliotomyveterinary education

Identifiers

PMID40150353
PMCPMC11939662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.