Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150308›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Prognostic Insights in Feline Mammary Carcinomas: Clinicopathological Factors and the Proposal of a New Staging System.

Mónica Monteiro, Gonçalo Petrucci, Felisbina L Queiroga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A One Health Perspective on Cancer: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Inflammatory Mammary Carcinoma in a Captive Bengal Tiger (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Mapping Feline Oncology in Portugal: A National Characterization.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mónica MonteiroDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 4150-562 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0006-8869-5194
Gonçalo PetrucciOneVet Group, Hospital Veterinário do Porto, 4150-562 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1751-2419
Felisbina L QueirogaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 4150-562 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-8381

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00772/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feline mammary carcinoma (FMC) is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Clinical staging is crucial for risk assessment, yet the current WHO system lacks granularity, particularly in Stage III. Aligning this system with human breast cancer staging has the potential to improve prognostic accuracy. Additionally, prognostic factors such as tumor size, ulceration, lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion require further evaluation. This study retrospectively analyzed 75 female cats with FMC to assess the prognostic impact of clinicopathological factors and evaluate a novel staging system (new staging) adapted from the

Indexed as

Cox regressionmammary carcinomasprognosisstagingsurvival analysisTNM system

Identifiers

PMID40150308
PMCPMC11939706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.