Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150276›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Resurgence of Severe Challenging Behavior and Schedule Thinning with the Terminal Schedule Probe Method.

Craig W Strohmeier, Elizabeth Thuman, John Michael Falligant, Mirela Cengher, Michelle D Chin, Patricia F Kurtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Craig W StrohmeierKennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Elizabeth ThumanKennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0820-8530
John Michael FalligantDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Mirela CengherDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
Michelle D ChinKennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7723-7378
Patricia F KurtzKennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3236-9622

Funding

A Single-Arm Pilot trial for Mitigating Relapse of Severe Problem BehaviorR21HD112724 · NICHD · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI FALLIGANT, JOHN · 2024 to 2025
$426k
Using Behavioral Economics to Mitigate Relapse of Problem Behavior in an Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities PopulationR21HD113794 · NICHD · OAKLAND UNIVERSITY · PI KRANAK, MICHAEL · 2024 to 2024
$426k
Optimizing Dimensions of Reinforcement to Enhance Behavioral InterventionsR21HD113881 · NICHD · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI FALLIGANT, JOHN · 2024 to 2025
$385k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD112724NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD113794NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD113881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple schedules promote schedule thinning during treatment for challenging behavior. Some strategies for multiple-schedule-thinning progressions include dense-to-lean (DTL; gradually thinning schedules of reinforcement in small steps), fixed lean (FL; abruptly shifting to lean schedules), and terminal probe (TP; probing terminal schedule values to inform subsequent thinning steps) thinning. Recent research indicates that TP thinning offers an empirically derived process for schedule thinning to terminal schedule values. In the current investigation, we replicated, re-analyzed, and extended recent research on the TP-thinning method. The schedule-thinning outcomes were consistent with the initial investigation, indicating that longer periods of reinforcer unavailability were facilitated by TP thinning in comparison with DTL thinning. We also examined resurgence, or the temporary increase in challenging behavior after alternative behavior is placed on extinction, across a wide range of downshifts in reinforcement. When resurgence occurred across ranges of downshifts programmed for both schedule-thinning methods, it occurred more often with DTL thinning. The resurgence analyses did not reveal an exponential increase in challenging behavior as a function of downshifts in reinforcement, which is an interesting departure from recent investigations. Points of discussion include clinical implications and areas for future research on the TP-thinning method.

Indexed as

challenging behaviorfunctional analysismultiple scheduleresurgenceschedule thinning

Identifiers

PMID40150276
PMCPMC11939573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.