ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Understanding Public Emotions: Spatiotemporal Dynamics in the Post-Pandemic Era Through Weibo Data.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prolonged exposure to public health crises in the post-pandemic era poses significant threats to global mental health. To address this, we developed a conceptual model to analyse the spatiotemporal distribution of public emotions, using Weibo data from the 2022 Beijing bar outbreak (9 June-18 August). The model integrates lexicon-based emotion analysis, spatial autocorrelation tests, and content analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of emotional responses across stages and regions. The findings reveal a multi-peak emotional cycle spanning emergency, contagion, and resolution stages, with significant emotional clustering in emergency zones, surrounding areas, and regions visited by infected individuals. Through coding, we identified 24 main-categories and 90 sub-categories, distilled into nine core themes that illustrate the interplay between influencing factors, public emotions, and online behaviours. Positive public emotions (e.g., hopefulness, gratitude, optimism) were linked to pandemic improvements and policy implementation, driving behaviours such as supporting prevention measures and resisting misinformation. Negative emotions (e.g., anger, anxiety, sadness) stemmed from severe outbreaks, insufficient controls, and restrictions on freedoms, leading to criticism and calls for accountability. This study bridges big data analytics with behavioural science, offering critical insights into evolving public emotions and behaviours. By highlighting spatiotemporal patterns and emotional dynamics, it provides actionable guidance for governments and health organizations to design targeted interventions, foster resilience, and better manage future social crises with precision and empathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.