ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Predicting Leadership Status Through Trait Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Ability.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many interconnected factors have been implicated in the prediction of whether a given individual occupies a managerial role. These include an assortment of demographic variables such as age and gender as well as trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) and cognitive ability. In order to disentangle their respective effects on formal leadership position, the present study compares a traditional linear approach in the form of a logistic regression with the results of a set of supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms. In addition to merely extending beyond linear effects, a series of techniques were incorporated so as to practically apply ML approaches and interpret their results, including feature importance and interactions. The results demonstrated the superior predictive strength of trait EI over cognitive ability, especially of its sociability factor, and supported the predictive utility of the random forest (RF) algorithm in this context. We thereby hope to contribute and support a developing trend of acknowledging the genuine complexity of real-world contexts such as leadership and provide direction for future investigations, including more sophisticated ML approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.