ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Informing Student Admission Decisions.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
University resources are limited, and strategic admission management is required in certain fields that have high application volumes but limited available study places. Student admission processes need to select an appropriate number of applicants to ensure the optimal enrollment while avoiding over- or underenrollment. The traditional approach often relies on the enrollment yields from previous years, assuming fixed admission probabilities for all applicants and ignoring statistical uncertainty, which can lead to suboptimal decisions. In this study, we propose a novel machine-learning-based approach to improving student admission decisions. Trained on historical application data, this approach predicts the number of enrolled applicants conditionally based on the number of admitted applicants, incorporates the statistical uncertainty of these predictions, and derives the probability of the number of enrolled applicants being larger or smaller than the available study places. The application of this approach is illustrated using empirical application data from a German university. In this illustration, first, several machine learning models were trained and compared. The best model was selected. This was then applied to applicant data for the next year to estimate the individual enrollment probabilities, which were aggregated to predict the number of applicants enrolled and the probability of this number being larger or smaller than the available study places. When this approach was compared with the traditional approach using fixed enrollment yields, the results showed that the proposed approach enables data-driven adjustments to the number of admitted applicants, ensuring controlled risk of over- and underenrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.