ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Role of Individual Capabilities in Maximizing the Benefits for Students Using GenAI Tools in Higher Education.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI, Cognitive Offloading, and Learner Agency in Higher Education: A Scoping Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Shaping University Students' Learning Behavior: A Mixed-Method Research Based on the COM-B Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI and the Future of Work: Assessing Occupational Social Status Perceptions Among University Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The impact of risk perception on perceived benefits of generative artificial intelligence users-an empirical study based on university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Investigating the double-edged sword effect of GenAI use on international students' school adjustment.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The effect of generative artificial intelligence literacy on academic achievement: the mediating role of academic self-efficacy and the moderating role of critical thinking.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Effect of GenAI Dependency on University Students' Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Perceived Teacher Caring.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of generative AI in international students' sociocultural adaptation: a cognitive-affective model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the adoption and benefits of GenAI (Generative Artificial Intelligence) tools among higher education students have been widely explored in existing studies, less is known about how individual capabilities influence the use of these tools. Drawing on the Information System Success Model (ISSM) and the Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM), this study examines how students' capabilities, including critical thinking, self-directed learning ability, and AI literacy, impact the quality of information obtained from GenAI tools. Additionally, it explores the relationships among information quality, student satisfaction, and the intention to continue using GenAI tools in higher education. Survey data from 1448 GenAI tools users in Chinese universities reveal that students with stronger capabilities tend to extract higher-quality information, which in turn fosters their satisfaction with GenAI tools and the intention to continue using these tools. The findings highlight the crucial role of individual capabilities in maximizing the potential of GenAI tools, and it emphasizes the need to cultivate students' critical thinking, self-directed learning ability, and AI literacy to achieve sustainable success in the GenAI era. Theoretically, this study extends the ISSM and ECM by exploring the impact of students' capabilities and the mediating role of user satisfaction between information quality and the intention to continue using GenAI tools. Practically, this study provides implications for educators and policymakers to enhance students' capabilities, thus maximizing the potential benefits of GenAI tools in higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.