Alcohol and Cannabis Perceived Descriptive and Injunctive Norms, Personal Use, and Consequences Among 2-Year College Students.

Jennifer C Duckworth, Kristi M Morrison, Christine M Lee

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer C DuckworthDepartment of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.

Kristi M MorrisonDepartment of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.

Christine M LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

A mixed methods study of perceived social norms and high-risk alcohol and marijuana use among a diverse sample of young adult community college studentsF32AA028153 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DUCKWORTH, JENNIFER C · 2019 to 2019

$47k

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute Small Grant Award at the University of Washington No numberNIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA028153NIAAA NIH HHS F32AA028153

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-year college students represent 35% of U.S. undergraduates, yet substance use among them is understudied. Grounded in Social Norms Theory, the present study examined alcohol and cannabis use prevalence and associations between perceived peer use (descriptive norms), approval of use (injunctive norms), and personal use among 2-year students. We also explored whether identification with the reference group or age moderated associations. Data were collected from May through August of 2020 from 1037 2-year college students in Washington State (screening sample) aged 18-29. Of these, 246 participants who reported recent, moderate alcohol and/or cannabis use completed a follow-up survey. Screening survey participants reported past-month alcohol and cannabis use and demographics, while follow-up participants provided data on perceived peer descriptive and injunctive norms and group identification. Screening participants reported drinking an average of 3.32 (

Indexed as

2-year studentsalcoholcannabiscommunity college studentsperceived norms

Identifiers

PMID40150145

DOI10.3390/bs15030251

PMCPMC11939714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.